Pygmy blue whales seen on a 2018 survey, New Zealand

Registros

Los datos en este recurso de registros biológicos han sido publicados como Archivo Darwin Core(DwC-A), el cual es un formato estándar para compartir datos de biodiversidad como un conjunto de una o más tablas de datos. La tabla de datos del core contiene 36 registros.

Este IPT archiva los datos y, por lo tanto, sirve como repositorio de datos. Los datos y los metadatos del recurso están disponibles para su descarga en la sección descargas. La tabla versiones enumera otras versiones del recurso que se han puesto a disposición del público y permite seguir los cambios realizados en el recurso a lo largo del tiempo.

Versiones

La siguiente tabla muestra sólo las versiones publicadas del recurso que son de acceso público.

¿Cómo referenciar?

Los usuarios deben citar este trabajo de la siguiente manera:

Goetz K, Childerhouse S, Paton D, Ogle M, Hupman K, Constantine R, Double M, Andrews-Goff V, Zerbini A, Olson P (2024). Pygmy blue whales seen on a 2018 survey, New Zealand. Version 1.0. The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA). Occurrence dataset. https://nzobisipt.niwa.co.nz/resource?r=pygmy_bluewhale_2018_nz&v=1.0

Derechos

Los usuarios deben respetar los siguientes derechos de uso:

El publicador y propietario de los derechos de este trabajo es The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA). Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons de Atribución/Reconocimiento (CC-BY 4.0).

Registro GBIF

Este recurso ha sido registrado en GBIF con el siguiente UUID: 37688194-45ab-40cd-b3ea-a307e41d30dd.  The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) publica este recurso y está registrado en GBIF como un publicador de datos avalado por GBIF New Zealand.

Palabras clave

Occurrence; Observation

Contactos

Cobertura geográfica

northern West Coast, South Island and South Taranaki Bight, New Zealand

Cobertura temporal

Métodos de muestreo

Visual surveys for blue whales were conducted from the M/V Star Keys operated by Western Workboats. A smaller six-meter vessel ‘Brig’ outfitted with a specialized bowsprit was housed on-board for tagging and biopsy operations. Due to the limited time available, survey effort was initially focused in the Taranaki region due to a previously described high density of blue whale sightings in the area (Torres 2013; Torres et al. 2017). The research team consisted of Kimberly Goetz (NIWA, voyage leader), Simon Childerhouse (Blue Planet Marine, tagger), Dave Paton (Blue Planet Marine, small boat driver), Mike Ogle (Department of Conservation, biopsy collector), and Krista Hupman (NIWA, photo-identification).

Descripción de la metodología paso a paso:

1. All visual surveys were conducted on an outdoor platform located above the wheelhouse, approximately 7 m above the water. During each survey, the research team rotated between three positions (left observer, recorder, right observer) and alternated between searching with and without 7x 50 binoculars. Each observer spent an hour at each position (three hours on-effort) followed by two hours off-effort to minimize fatigue. A custom-built survey program was used to record all survey information which consisted of sighting (position, date, number of individuals, behavior) and weather data (Beaufort, swell, sun position, glare, horizon visibility). Additional aerial surveys were undertaken to provide wider search effort for the survey.
2. Upon sighting a suspected blue whale, the vessel was guided towards the whale for species confirmation. If conditions were suitable, the Brig was launched and the main vessel acted as a safety and support vessel. The boat driver approached the animal to within 5-10 m while the tagger attached a satellite tag (SPOT-303F with a 45-sec repetition rate, Wildlife Computers) using a compressed air powered deployment (ARTS system) and collected a biopsy sample using Paxarm biopsy system. A biopsy was only attempted after tag attachment or when conditions were not suitable for tagging.
3. Because there is often only one chance to get within 10 m of a blue whale, the tasks were prioritized as follows: 1) tag deployment, 2) biopsy sample, 3) photo-identification.
4. When collected, biopsy samples were split and either frozen or stored in 70% ethanol for the following analyses: 1) genetic composition (ethanol), 2) stable isotope analysis (frozen), 3) hormone analysis (frozen). If the size of the biopsy sample allowed, a small portion was stored in ethanol to be housed in the tissue archive maintained by the University of Auckland. Before, during, and after tagging and biopsy operations, attempts were made to take photos for photo-identification using high resolution digital SLR cameras. However, given the priority of operations and time constraints, obtaining photographs of both right and left sides of individual animals was not possible. All data were archived at the end of each day for later quality control and reconciliation.

Referencias bibliográficas

1. Satellite tracking of blue whales in New Zealand waters, 2018 voyage report. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337006236_Satellite_tracking_of_blue_whales_in_New_Zealand_waters_2018_voyage_report
2. Goetz, K.T., Childerhouse, S., Paton, D., Ogle, M., Hupman, K., Constantine, R., Double, M.C., Andrews-Goff, V., Zerbini, A.N. and Olson, P.A., 2018. Satellite tracking of blue whales in New Zealand waters, 2018 voyage report. Bled, Slovenia.

Metadatos adicionales